-
John Feodorov - Art 21
Office Shaman
-
John Feodorov - Navajo
Interview by Ana Briseno
March 2010
John Feodorov is an artist, musician, and teacher born and raised in between Los Angeles and the ‘White Horse’ region of New Mexico. I had the privilege to interview John last month. We talked about responsibility, desperation, and funny art.

100% Hybrid #1 - Mixed media on paper, 50 ” x 30 “, 2010

100% Hybrid #2 - Mixed media on paper, 50 ” x 30 “, 2010
Ana Briseno: My first encounter with your work was at a lecture you gave last May at the Portland Art Museum. I still have the flyer for the event pinned on a wall near my desk to remind me of things you talked about. It was fascinating to hear you speak about spirituality, appropriation, and being a Native American artist. There is certainly not enough discussion or consideration of those types of topics in the art world. I would like to begin with a question about that lecture:Your consideration in talking about responsibility and ambiguity was very interesting to me. Since the lecture I have continued to think about those subjects and my ideas on those issues constantly change and shift. Have your thoughts changed or further developed on the topics of responsibility and ambiguity within your work?
John Feodorov: I don’t completely remember the context of my statement, but I’ll try and clarify what I think I meant. I feel that artists not only have a responsibility to make work that is more than merely self-expression, but also to understand their subject and their relationship to that subject. Unintended ambiguity is simply the result of ignorance, or worse, laziness. That said, ambiguity can be a useful strategy in allowing the viewer the opportunity to engage with the work, without feeling preached to or accused. I think the best strategy is one that results in the viewer’s self-incrimination because I believe this realization is much more difficult for the viewer to ignore. True, it may not happen in front of the artwork, but Art has a funny way of sticking with people. I guess I prefer planting seeds to pointing fingers. So the ambiguity I’m talking about is not really ambiguity at all, but a well-planned strategy disguised as ambiguity.